This page documents the review governance standard for Phantom Gambling Devices before any on-site ratings, third-party review profiles, or Product review structured data are used.
Reviews should help buyers, educators, hosts, and reviewers understand real product experience. They should not be manufactured for star snippets, AI visibility, or ranking links.
Collection standard
- Invite reviews neutrally from real buyers, educators, verified sample recipients, or documented support/inquiry contacts.
- Do not ask only satisfied buyers for reviews, gate low-star feedback, or request specific wording, star ratings, anchors, or dofollow links.
- Product review invitations should identify the product, SKU, order or sample context, and disclosure expectations.
Moderation standard
- Remove or redact only content that is spam, personal data, hate or harassment, unrelated promotion, malware, impersonation, or clearly unverifiable abuse.
- Negative reviews should stay visible when they describe a real product, shipping, support, or sample experience.
- Support replies should address the issue, correction path, replacement/return option, or documentation request without pressuring the reviewer.
Structured data boundary
- Do not output Review or AggregateRating schema until real, visible, product-specific reviews exist on the same page.
- Do not mark organization, homepage, category, or self-serving business testimonials as review snippets.
- Third-party review profiles may be linked as entity references only when the profile is real and actively monitored.
Disclosure boundary
- Samples, discounts, affiliate access, paid sponsorships, or other material connections must be disclosed by reviewers and creators.
- AI-generated buyer reviews, employee reviews without disclosure, fake testimonials, review swaps, and competitor-negative reviews are not acceptable.
- User-submitted promotional links should use appropriate ugc, nofollow, or sponsored treatment where links are displayed.