This policy is designed for reviewers, creators, educators, podcast hosts, and community moderators who receive access to Phantom Gambling Devices products or reference materials.

The goal is aggressive visibility through real evaluation, useful demos, and honest editorial context, not manufactured ratings or hidden sponsorship.

Sample access

  • Samples may be offered for evaluation, demonstration, classroom review, stockist inspection, or media research.
  • Sample access does not require a positive review, a dofollow link, a specific keyword anchor, or approval of the final opinion.
  • Reviewers should disclose whether they received a sample, discount, affiliate relationship, travel support, or other material access.

Allowed review angles

  • Build quality, deck feel, instructional clarity, packaging, collector care, performance rehearsal, inspection workflow, and support experience.
  • How the product fits legal card magic, workshop education, anti-cheating education, or collection contexts.
  • Comparison with visible product specifications, feed data, shipping policy, and return policy.

Prohibited review framing

  • Claims that products help deceive real players, evade venue rules, or gain an unfair advantage in gambling.
  • Undisclosed paid praise, fake testimonials, review swaps, bulk ratings, or AI-generated buyer reviews.
  • Requests to hide product access, hide affiliate relationships, or redirect readers through misleading offers.

Citation preference

  • Citation preference: cite the most specific public URL for the topic: /en/press for media context, /en/articles/source-notes-for-card-magic-journalists for quote background, /en/articles/marked-deck-training-vs-cheating-misuse-boundary for use-case boundaries, /en/articles/card-integrity-inspection-log-template for the blank inspection template, and /en/feed-resources for machine-readable feeds and metadata. Avoid generic homepage-only citations when a guide, product category, policy page, or resource URL fits better.
  • For policy context, link to /en/articles/marked-deck-training-vs-cheating-misuse-boundary.
  • For media context, link to /en/press or /en/articles/source-notes-for-card-magic-journalists.
  • For technical resources, link to /en/feed-resources or /en/articles/card-integrity-inspection-log-template.